 |
Leslie Sedibe © Gallo Images |
SA'S WORLD CUP LEGACY: HIGHER TICKET PRICESSouth Africa is facing rising ticket prices and an uncertain future for its state of the art stadiums as the initial legacy of staging the first World Cup in Africa.
Just 10 days after Spain's victory in the final at the
94 700-seat Soccer City stadium in Johannesburg, the chief
executive of the South African Football Association told a
parliamentary committee on sport and recreation that football had
challenges to overcome to keep its world-class venues in use and
profitable.
"It is nice to tell people we filled up a stadium but how much
do we charge? R40?" Leslie Sedibe said on Tuesday. "People
need to understand ... we will have to revisit these issues around
ticket prices if we are serious about development, because that is
where the money is going to come from."
Sticking to traditionally low ticket prices for South Africa's
low-income football fans will mean the modern arenas - which are
more expensive to maintain - would face a struggle to make ends
meet.
The South African government spent an estimated $1.3 billion
building and upgrading the 10 stadiums used for the monthlong
tournament.
Sedibe said the new stadiums would cost at least R500 000 to hire for a day, without security costs, and charging
low prices for local games would mean "there is something wrong
with the economy."
More commercially successful sports in South Africa like rugby
and cricket could ensure the stadiums are properly utilized. Many
of the facilities have no home team and no regular source of
income.
At Tuesday's committee meeting, Graham Mackenzie, a member of
parliament, urged Safa to meet with rugby and cricket bosses
immediately.
"We have magnificent stadiums and at the moment they are ranked
No. 1 in the world," Mackenzie said. "If we engaged other sports,
we can ensure we don't have a legacy of 'white elephants."
South Africa's rugby world champion Springboks are set to face
New Zealand in a Tri-Nations game at Soccer City on Aug. 21. Most
of the tickets will cost R350 or more, and the South
African Rugby Union is expecting an 88 000 sellout.
Durban's Moses Mabhida Stadium - also built for the World Cup -
will host a Twenty20 cricket match between South Africa and India
in early 2011 after an agreement between the city council and
Cricket South Africa.
It's hoped similar deals may be struck at Cape Town's
70 000-seat Green Point Stadium. But they appear few and far
between.
Many of the country's long-standing provincial rugby and cricket
teams are reluctant to move away from their home stadiums, which
are cheaper to run.
Even the country's two biggest football clubs, Kaizer Chiefs and
Orlando Pirates, have said they will stay at smaller, more
manageable stadiums in the township of Soweto - and not at the
nearby Soccer City.
It could also prove difficult to attract big crowds to the new
stadiums in the more remote northern cities of Rustenburg,
Polokwane and Nelspruit.
The World Cup afterglow is already fading for some as the rising
cost of the biggest football event becomes apparent to a country
still wrestling with widespread poverty.
South Africa's Student Congress has already criticized the World
Cup as a waste of money.
"We could have used the same money, energy, zeal and enthusiasm
to provide water, electricity, houses and free education for
millions of poor South Africans," Sasco president Mbulelo Mandlana
said.
Meanwhile, the boots South Africa midfielder Siphiwe Tshabalala
used to score the first goal at the World Cup in the opening match
against Mexico on June 11 will go on display as part of a historic
monument at Safa headquarters.
"(The boots) represent hope and they represent that we can
deliver on a world stage," Sedibe said.